Post-covid-19: how should cosmology and ethics respond? (I)

There is something terrible, nature’s systemic attack on humanity, through a microscopic and invisible virus that is causing great concern and killing thousands of people. Faced with this true human tragedy we need to understand our reaction to the pandemic. What is the pandemic’s effect on us? What lesson does it teach us? What cosmology (vision of the world) and what type of ethics (values and principles) does it call on us to develop? Surely we now must learn everything that we should have learned but didn’t learn before. We should have learned that we are part of nature and not its “lords and owners” (Descartes). There is an umbilical connection between the human being and nature. We come from the same cosmic dust, as all other beings did. We are the conscious link of the chain of life.

                   The erosion of the image, “little god of the Earth”

The modern myth has been destroyed that we are “the little god” of Earth and that we can dispose of her at our whim because she is an inert object without purpose. One of the fathers of the modern scientific method, Francis Bacon, said that we must treat nature as the henchmen of the inquisition treated their victims, torturing them until they gave up all their secrets.

Through techno science we have carried this method to the extreme, reaching the heart of matter and of life. This has been done with unprecedented furor, to the point of destroying the sustainability of nature and consequently of the planet and of life. We have broken the natural pact that exists with the living Earth: she gives all everything we need to live, and in exchange we must care for her, preserving her goods and services and affording her rest, in order to replenish what we have taken for our lives and progress.  We have done none of this.

For failing to observe the Biblical precept of “protecting and caring for the Garden of Eden, The Earth (Genesis 2,15)” and for threatening the ecological bases that sustain all life, she has counterattacked with a powerful weapon, the corona virus 19. Facing it, we have returned to the methodology of the Middle Ages, that overcame its pandemics with strict social isolation. So that the frightened people would get out of the streets, an ingenious clock was built in the Munich municipal council (Marienplatz), with dancers and cuckoos so that everyone would come to appreciate it, something that is still being done today.

The pandemic, that more than than a crisis is a demand for a change of cosmology (the vision  of the world) and of the incorporation of an ethics with new values, posits us this question: do we really want to avoid nature sending us even more lethal viruses that could even decimate the human species? We would be one of the ten species that disappear forever each day. Do we want to run that risk?

                   Generalized lack of awareness of the ecological factor

Already in 1962, North American biologist and writer Rachel Carson, author of The Silent Spring,  warned: “It is not likely that future generations will forgive our lack of prudent concern for the integrity of the natural world that sustains all life… The question is whether any civilization can continue a relentless war against life without destroying itself and without losing the right to be called a civilization“.

It seems like a prophesy of the situation we are experiencing all around the world. It appears that the majority of humanity, including the political leaders, do not show enough awareness of the dangers we face with global warming, with the excessive density of our cities and, especially, of the massive agro-business that advances over the virgin lands into the jungles that are being deforested. We are destroying the habitats of millions of viruses and bacteria that wind up being transferred to human beings. According to serious scientists, the corona virus did not have to come though a bat from a market in China, but, simply, from nature.

In the best hypothesis, corona virus will force us to re-invent ourselves as humanity, and to remodel in a sustainable and inclusive form the unique Common Home that we share. If what dominated before prevails, exacerbated to the extreme, then we must prepare for the worst.

Many are predicting a new, destructive, austerity in the post-corona virus era. The vultures of the past are already gathering to return to the same perspective of the past, and to impede significant change. The interests of financial capital and the lack of consciousness on the part of those in power, and even in much of academia, about the gravity of the degradation of nature, does not allow them learn anything from the thousands and thousands of dead human beings all over the world, caused by the corona vírus.

They want to return to the austerity that is the politics of opportunists, carried out by opportunists, for the benefit of opportunists. CEPAL has calculated that because of covid-19, the politics of austerity, worse than before, will leave 215 million new poor people in Latin America. (cf. Carta Maior 13/05/2020) However, it is worth remembering that the life system has gone though several major extinctions (we are in the sixth) but it has always survived.

Life seems like –allow me a singular metaphor– a “plague” that no one until now has managed to exterminate. That is because life is a blessed “plague”, linked to the mystery of the cosmogenesis and to that mysterious and loving Basic Energy that presides over all the cosmic processes and also over ours.

ThIs is imperative that we abandon the old paradigm of the will to power and domination over everything (the closed fist). in favor of a paradigm of caring for everything that exists and lives  (the extended hand) and of the collective co-responsibility.

Eric Hobsbawn wrote in the last paragraph of his 1995 book, The Era of the Extremes: “One thing is clear. If humanity wants to have a recognizable future, it cannot be prolonging the past or the present. We will fail if we try to build the third millennia on that basis. In other words, the price of failure, the alternative to the change of society, is obscurity.” (p.506).

That means we cannot simply return to the situation before corona virus. Nor we can think of returning to the pre-enlightenment past, as the present Brazilian government and others of the extreme right want.

(To be continued).

Leonardo Boff is an ecotheologian and philosopher who has written Option Earth: the solution for the Earth does not come from heaven, Record 2009.

 

 

O cosmólogo Mark Hathaway e Leonardo Boff conversam sobre o covid-19

Pode-se interpretar a irrupção da pandemia do convid-19 sob muitos aspectos, feitos já a partir de muitas perspectivas científicas, políticas, econômicas e ecológicas. Aqui se propõe um diálogo entre a nova cosmologia, a comunidade de vida e a presença do coronavírus entre o prof. de cosmologia e ética da universidade de Toronto e comigo, pois juntos escrevemos um grosso livro com o título O Tao da Libertação:explorando a ecologia da Transformação”(Orbis Books 2009/Vozes 2012/ Trotta 2014) bem recebido pela comunidade científica. Conta com um prefácio do conhecido físico quântico e ecologista Fritjof Capra. O título Tao se refere ao diálogo entre a cosmologia ocidental e a sabedoria ancestral do Oriente. O encontro será no dia 26 de maio a partir das 14.00,hora do Brasil. Aqui vai o convite para esse live que promete ser interessante. A língua usada será o espanhol com tradução para o inglê sse o francês,línguas faladas no Canadá.  LBoff

Español:
En Diálogo con Leonardo Boff y Mark Hathaway

Martes, 26 de mayo, 1:00-2:30 PM EDT
Afiche/Grafico: http://tiny.cc/boff-es
Inscripción: http://tiny.cc/boff
Convertir la hora a tu hora local: http://tiny.cc/boff-hora
Encontrémonos con Mark Hathaway del Foro Jesuita en conversación con el ecoteólogo Leonardo Boff sobre algunos temas claves que surgen de la encíclica Laudato Sí.

Juntos, explorarán:

Por qué la crisis ecológica es, ante todo, una crisis de relaciones,
Cómo la ecología integral entrelaza las dimensiones sociales, económicas, ambientales y espirituales,
Cómo responder al llamado a una conversión ecológica radical, y
Cómo se puede poner en práctica una espiritualidad ecológica.

Más detalles

Leonardo Boff es el teólogo más reconocido de Brasil, autor de unos cien libros sobre la teología de la liberación, ecología y espiritualidad, y ganador del Premio Right Livelihood en 2001. Junto con Boff, Mark Hathaway escribió el libro El Tao de la Liberación: Una Ecología de la Transformación (Orbis, 2009; Vozes, 2012; Trotta, 2014).

English:

In Dialogue with Leonardo Boff and Mark Hathaway
Tuesday, May 26, 1-2:30 PM EDT
Poster / Graphic: http://tiny.cc/boff-en
Registration: http://tiny.cc/boff
Convert event time to your local time at: http://tiny.cc/boff-time
This event will be in Spanish and interpreted into both English and French
Please join the Jesuit Forum’s Mark Hathaway in conversation with renowned Brazilian theologian Leonardo Boff on key themes arising from the encyclical Laudato Sí.
Together, they will explore:

Why the ecological crisis is, at its heart, a crisis of relationships,
How integral ecology weaves together social, economic, environmental, and spiritual dimensions,
How to respond to the call to radical ecological conversion, and
How to live out an ecological spirituality in practice.

More Details

Leonardo Boff is Brazil’s best-known theologian, author of hundred books on liberation theology, ecology, and spirituality, and recipient of the 2001 Right Livelihood Award. Mark Hathaway, the Jesuit Forum’s Associate Director, co-authored The Tao of Liberation: Exploring the Ecology of Transformation with Boff (Orbis, 2009).

Français

En Dialogue avec Leonardo Boff/ Mark Hathaway
Mardi, 26 mai 2020, 1h00 à 2h30 (EDT)
Affiche et graphique : http://tiny.cc/boff-fr
Inscription : http://tiny.cc/boff
Convertir à l’heure locale : http://tiny.cc/boff-heure
Rejoignez Mark Hathaway du Jesuit Forum pour une conversation avec le théologien et penseur altermondialiste Leonardo Boff autour des thèmes clés de l’encyclique Laudato Sí’.
Ensemble, ils se demanderont :

Pourquoi la crise écologique est d’abord et avant tout, une crise des relations,
– De quelle manière l’écologie intégrale peut lier entre elles les dimensions sociales, économiques, environnementales et spirituelles de notre Maison commune ;
– Comment répondre à l’appel à une conversion écologique radicale lancé par le pape François
Comment mettre en pratique la spiritualité écologique au cœur de Laudato Si’.

Plus de détails
Leonardo Boff est le théologien le plus renommé du Brésil, auteur de presque cent livres sur la théologie de la libération, l’écologie et la spiritualité, et lauréat du Right Livelihood Award en 2001. Avec Boff, Mark Hathaway a écrit le livre The Tao of Liberation : Exploring the Ecology of Transformation (Orbis, 2009 ; Vozes, 2012 ; Trotta, 2014).

 

 

What may come after the coronavirus?

Many see it clearly now: after the coronavirus, it no longer will be possible to continue capitalism as the mode of production, nor neo-liberalism as its political expression. Capitalism only serves the rich, for everyone else it is purgatory, or hell, and for nature, capitalism is an endless war.

What is saving us now is not competition –the principal motor of capitalism– but cooperation. Not individualism –the cultural expression of capitalism– but the inter dependency of everyone and everything.

But getting to the central point: we have discovered that life is the supreme value, not the accumulation of material goods. The military apparatus, capable of destroying several times over all life on Earth has proven to be ridiculous when faced with a microscopic invisible enemy that threatens the whole of humanity. Could this be the Next Big One (NBO) the biologists fear?, “the next great virus” that will destroy the future of life? We do not believe so. We hope that the Earth will continue having compassion for us and that she is only giving us a kind of ultimatum.

The threatening virus comes from nature, so social isolation offers us the opportunity to question:what our relationship with nature, and, more generally, with the Earth as Common Home, have been and how they should be. Medicine and technology, while very necessary, are not enough. Their function is to attack the virus – to exterminate it. But if we continue attacking the living Earth, “our home with a unique community of life”, as the Earthcharter says (Preamble), she will counter attack again with even more lethal pandemics, until one will exterminate us.

As it happens, the majority of humanity and heads of state do not realize that we already are in the sixth massive extinction. Until now we neither felt ourselves as part of nature, or even as its conscious part. Our relationship is not like the relationship one has with a living being, Gaia, that has value in itself and must be respected, but merely one of use, for our comfort and well being. We are violently exploiting the Earth to the point that 60% of the land has been eroded, and the same percentage of the tropical jungles. We are causing an amazing devastation of species, between 70-100 thousand extinctions a year. This is the current reality of the anthropocene and the necrocene. If we continue on this path we will come face to face with our own extinction.

We have no alternative than to perform, in the words of the papal Encyclical Letter “On he caring of the Common Home”, a “radical ecological conversion”. In this sense, coronavirus is not a crisis as other crises, but the friendly and caring demand of our relationship with nature. How can we implement it in a world dedicated to the exploitation of all the ecosystems? There are not ready available projects yet. Everyone in the world is engaged in the search. The worst that could happen to us would be, after the pandemic, to go back to what there was before the pandemic: factories producing at full speed, if with minimal ecological care. We know that the huge corporations are coordinating with each other to recuperate the time and profits lost.

But we must recognize that this conversion cannot be swift, but gradual. When Emmanuel Macron, President of France, said, “the lesson of the pandemic was that there are goods and services that must not depend on market forces”, it provoked a rush of tens of great ecologist organizations such as Oxfam, Attac and others, asking that the 750.000 millions of euros that the European Central Bank earmarked to remedy the corporate losses be destined instead to social and ecological conversion of the productive apparatus towards a better caring of nature, more justice and social equality. Logically, this only will be accomplished by widening the debate, involving all types of groups, from popular participation up to scientific knowledge, until conviction and a collective responsibility arise.

We must be fully conscious of one thing: as global warming rises and the world population increasingly devastates natural habitats, thus bringing human beings closer to wild animals, they will transmit more viruses, to which we humans will not be immune, that will find in us new hosts. Thus will be born the devastating pandemic.

The essential point that cannot be set aside is the new conception of the Earth, no longer as a market of businesses that put us as her masters (dominus), apart from and above her, but as a living super entity, a self regulating and self creating system, of which we are the conscious and responsible part, together with the other beings as brothers and sisters. The transition from dominus (owner) to brother and sister will require a new mindset and a new heart, capable of seeing the Earth through new eyes, and feeling in our hearts that we belong to her and to the Great Whole. Along with that, the feeling of inter-retro-relationship of all with all and a collective responsibility in facing the common future. Only that way will we reach, as the Earthcharter prognosticates, “a sustainable way of life” and a guarantee for the future of life and of Mother Earth.

The present phase of social seclusion may be a sort of reflexive and humanist retreat to think about such things and our responsibility towards them. It is urgent and time is short. We must not get there too late.

Leonardo Boff Eco-Theologian-Philosopher of  the Earthcharter Commission

Free translation from the Spanish sent by
Melina Alfaro, alfaro_melina@yahoo.com.ar.
Done at REFUGIO DEL RIO GRANDE, Texas, EE.UU.

Coronavirus awakens the human in us

The coronavirus pandemic forces us all to think: what really counts, life or material goods? The individualism of each on his own, without concern for the other, or the solidarity of one with the other? Can we continue exploiting, thoughtlessly, the natural goods and services, in order to live every more comfortably, or can we take care of nature, the vitality of Mother Earth and good living, namely, harmony among and with all of nature’s beings? Has it ever been worthwhile for the war loving countries to accumulate ever more weapons of mass destruction, now that they are brought to their knees before an invisible virus, revealing the inefficacy of all that deadly apparatus? Can we continue with our consumerist life style, accumulating unlimited wealth in only a few hands, at the expense of millions of poor and miserable human beings? Is it still meaningful that each country affirms its sovereignty, in opposition to that of other countries, when we need a global government to solve global problems? Why have we still not discovered the unique Common Home, Mother Earth, and our duty to care for her, so that we all, nature included, may fit within her?

These are question that can not be avoided. No one has the answers. However, one saying, attributed to Einstein, is true: “the world vision that created the crisis cannot be the same as the one that leads us out of the crisis”. We must drastically change. The worst thing would be if everything ended up as before, with the same consumerist and speculative logic, perhaps with greater fury now. Then, maybe because we learned nothing, the Earth would send us another virus that perhaps could put an end to the disastrous human project.

But we can look at the war the coronavirus is producing all over the planet, from another, positive, angle. The virus forces us to discover our deepest and most authentic human nature. Our nature is ambiguous, good and bad. Let’s look at the good dimension.

In the first place, we are beings of relationships. We are, as I have repeated numerous times, a knot of total relationships in all directions. Consequently, no one is an island. We tend to build bridges in all directions.

In the second place, as a result, we all depend on one another. The African expression, “Ubuntu”, says it well: “I am myself through you”.Consequently, all individualism, the soul of capitalist culture, is false and anti-human. The coronavirus proves it. The health of one depends of the health of the other. This mutual dependency, consciously assumed, is called solidarity. In another time, solidarity enabled us to leave the anthropoid world and allowed us to become human, living together and helping each other. These weeks we have seen moving gestures of true solidarity, giving not just our left overs, but sharing what we have.

In the third place, we are essentially caring beings. Without caring, from our conception and throughout life, no one could subsist. We must care for everything: for ourselves, otherwise we could get sick and die; we must care for the others, those who could save me or I could save them; I must take care of nature: otherwise, she will come at us with a dreadful virus, devastating droughts and floods, extreme weather events; caring for Mother Earth so that she continues giving us all that we need to live, and so that she still wants us on her soil, even though for centuries we have wounded her pitilessly. Especially now, under attack by the coronavirus, we all must be caring, caring for the most vulnerable, staying home, maintaining social distance, and take care of the sanitation infrastructure, without which we could witness a humanitarian catastrophe of Biblical proportions.

In the fourth place, we discover that we all must be co-responsible, this is, to be conscious of the beneficial or malefic consequences of our acts. Life and death are in our hands, human lives, social, economic and cultural lives. That the State or a few people show responsibility is not enough; it must be everyone’s responsibility, because we are all affected and each of us can affect the others. We must all accept confinement.

Finally, we are spiritual beings. We discover the strength of the spiritual world that constitutes our Profound, where great dreams are created, where the ultimate questions about the meaning of our lives are born, and where we feel that a loving and powerful Energy that impregnates everything must exist; Energy that sustains the starry heavens and our own lives, over which we do not have full control. We can open up to that Energy, welcome her as in a wager, trust that this Energy holds us in the palm of her hand and, in spite of all the contradictions, that she guarantees a good end for all the universe, for our history, both wise and demented, and for each and everyone of us. Cultivating this spiritual world we feel stronger, more caring, loving, and in the end, more human.

With these values we are given the ability to dream and to build a different type of world, bio-centered, in which the economy, with a different rationality, sustains a globally integrated society, strengthened more by affective alliances that by legal pacts. It will be the society of caring, gentleness and the joy of living.

Leonardo Boff Eco-Theologian-Philosopher  of the Earthcharter Commission

Free translation from the Spanish sent by
Melina Alfaro, alfaro_melina@yahoo.com.ar.
Done at REFUGIO DEL RIO GRANDE, Texas, EE.UU.