Rose Marie Muraro: the saga of an impossible woman

On June 21th, one of the most significant Brazilian women of the XX century: Rose Marie Muraro (1930-2014), ended her Earthly pilgrimage in Rio de Janeiro. She was born almost blind, but she turned this deficiency into the great challenge of her life. Soon she knew by intuition that only the impossible opens the doors to the new; only the impossible creates. That is what she says in her book, Memoirs of an Impossible Woman (Memorias de una mujer imposible, 1999, 35). With very limited vision, she studied physics and economics. But shortly thereafter she discovered her intellectual vocation as a student of the human condition, especially the female condition. In the late 1960s, she stirred up the polemical question of gender. She did not limit herself to the unequal power relationships between men and women, but also denounced the oppressive relationships in culture, the sciences, philosophical currents, institutions, the State and the economic system. Finally, she came to understand that the principal root of this system that dehumanizes both women and men resides in patriarchy.

She realized in herself an impressive process of liberation, narrated in her book, The Six Months when I was a Man, (Los seis meses en que fui hombre, 1990, 6th edition). But perhaps the most important work by Rose Marie Muraro was The Sexuality of the Brazilian Woman: body and social class in Brazil, (Sexualidad de la Mujer Brasilera: cuerpo y clase social en Brasil, 1996). It is about a field investigation in several States of the Brazilian federation, analyzing how sexuality is experienced, taking into account the class situation of women, something absent in the founding fathers of the psychoanalytic treatise. In this field, Rose innovated, creating a theoretical framework that helps us understand the experience of sexuality and the body, according to social class. What type of individuation can a starving woman realize, who in order that her little child not die, gives blood from her own body?

I worked with Rose for 17 years, as editors of Editorial Vozes: she was responsible for the scientific part and I for the religious. Even under the strict control of the military organs of repression, Rose had the courage to publish then banned authors, such as Darcy Ribeiro, Fernando Henrique Cardoso, Paulo Freire, the CEBRAP Notebooks, and others. After years of long joint discussion and study, we gathered our conversations in a book that I consider seminal, Feminine and Masculine: a new consciousness for encountering the differences, (Femenino & Masculino: una nueva conciencia para el encuentro de las diferencias, 2010). I note just one her phrases: «to educate a man is to educate an individual, but to educate a woman is to educate a society».

Without ever setting aside the feminine question (in man and woman), she soon turned her attention to the challenges of science and modern technology. Already in 1969 she published Automation and the future of man, (Autonomación y el futuro del hombre), were she foretold the precariousness of the working world.

The economic-financial crisis of 2008 led her to pose the question of capital/money in the book, Reinventing capital/money, (Reinventando el capital/dinero, 2012), where she emphasizes the relevance, as opposed to the dominant capitalist economy, of the social and complementary currencies, and the solidarian networks of exchange, that enable the less fortunate to guarantee their sustenance.

Another important work, truly rich with knowledge, data, and cultural reflections, is titled Technological Advances and the future of humanity: wanting to be God?, (Los avances tecnológicos y el futuro de la humanidad: ¿queriendo ser Dios?, 2009). In this work she confronts the leading sciences; nano-technology, robotics, genetic engineering, and synthetic biology. She sees advantages on those fronts, because she is not backwards, but in the fact of living in a society that turns everything into merchandise, including life itself, she perceived a grave risk that scientists would assume divine powers and use their knowledge to redesign the human species. Hence the subtitle: wanting to be God? That is the sad illusion of the scientists. What will save us is not the new Technological Revolution, but, as Rose says, a «Revolution of Sustainability is the only one that can save the human species from destruction… for to continue as we are, we will not be in a win-lose game, but in a terrible game of lose-lose, resulting in the destruction of our species, in which we all will lose» (Reinventing capital/money, 238).

Rose possessed a very acute sense of the world: she suffered with the global dramas and celebrated the few advances. In later times she saw dark clouds over the whole planet, putting our future in danger. She died preoccupied with the search for saving alternatives. A woman of profound faith and spirituality, she would dream of the human capacity for transforming the coming tragedy into a purifying crisis that illuminates the path to reconciling society with nature and Mother Earth. She concludes her book Technological Advances with this wise phrase: «when we quit being gods we can be fully human; while we still do not know what that is, we have always intuited it» (p. 354).

Officially proclaimed Patroness of Brazilian Feminism by the President of Brazil on December 30, 2005, through the creation of the Cultural Foundation, Rose Marie Muraro, in 2009, she leaves a rich legacy of humanism for future generations. Rose Marie Muraro showed in her personal saga that the impossible is not a limitation, but a challenge. She inscribed her name in the lineage of great archetypical women who have helped humanity keep alive the small sacred lamp of caring for all that still exists and lives. In that endeavor, she became immortal.

Free translation from the Spanish by
Servicios Koinonia, http://www.servicioskoinonia.org.
Done at REFUGIO DEL RIO GRANDE, Texas, EE.UU.

Who embarrassed Brazil at home and abroad

It is part of the popular football culture to boo some of the players, the judges and, finally, some authority who happens to be present. But here, the insults, expletives and obscenities that even children could hear is unprecedented in Brazilian football. The harsh words were directed at the highest authority of the country, President Dilma Rousseff, who was in a back seat of the official gallery.

These shameful insults could only come from a class of people that still has visibility in the country, “people of the very White class A, uneducated and sexist”, commented Ana Thurler, a sociologist with the Center for Feminist Studies.

Those who know something of the history of Brazil, or who have read Gilberto Freyre, Jose Honorio Rodrigues and Sergio Buarque de Hollanda, know how to identify such groups immediately. They are sectors of our elites, the most conservative in the world, who lag well behind in the process of global civilization, as Darcy Ribeiro used to point out; sectors that for 500 years occupied the levers of the State and voraciously benefited from it, denying the rights of citizens in order to guarantee corporative privileges. These groups have not yet rid themselves of the Big Mansion with which they are fixated, nor have they forgotten the pillory were the Black slaves were beaten. Not just their mouths are dirty; they are dirty because their minds are dirty. They are antiquated, and still think within the paradigms of the past, when they lived in luxury and conspicuous consumption, as in the times of Renaissance princes.

In the harsh language of Capistrano de Abreu, our main mulatto historian, the majority of the elite always «castrated and re-castrated, bled and bled again» the Brazilian people. And they are still doing it. With no sense of limits and thus full of arrogance, they believe they can hurl any insults they choose, and disrespect any authority.

What happened demonstrated to Brazilians and to the world the type of elites that still exists in Brazil. They embarrassed us at home and abroad. The people are not ignorant, uneducated or shameless, as they often think and say. Those who are shameless, uncouth, uneducated and ignorant are those who think and say such things about the people. They are mostly the independently wealthy, who live off financial speculation and have millions and millions of dollars abroad, in foreign banks or fiscal havens.

President Dilma put it well: “the people do not react this way; the people are civilized and extremely generous and educated”. The people can boo, and plenty do. But the people do not insult a woman with machista and chulo language, especially not the woman who holds the highest office in the country. With serenity and a palpable sense of dignity, Dilma personally replied to these uncivilized groups: “I have endured almost unbearable physical aggressions and nothing has deterred me from my path”. She was referring to the torture to which she was subjected by agents of the State of terror installed in Brazil beginning in 1968. In the speech she made later on television, she proved that nothing either deters her from her path, or scares her, because she lives with different values and aspires to be in consonance with the greatness of our country.

This shameful act was rejected by the majority of analysts and of those who spoke out publicly. However, the reaction of the two candidates to replace her in the Presidency was lamentable. They used practically the same expressions, in line with the brutish groups: “She is reaping what she sowed” said one. Another implied that she deserves the insults she received. Only the mean spirited and those lacking a sense of dignity could react in this manner. And they are the ones who want to define the destiny of the country. With that spirit! We are tired of mediocre leadership that continues scratching at the soil, like chickens, incapable of taking flight like the eagles we deserve, with a greatness proportionate to the size of our country.

A friend from Munich, who understands Portuguese well, was impacted by the insults, and commented: “not even in Nazi times were the authorities insulted in this manner”. Perhaps he does not know the history we have lived, the type of elite sectors that continue to dominate, and the overbearing manner in which they make themselves heard. They are primarily responsible for keeping us socially, culturally and ethically underdeveloped. They shame us in a manner that we really do not deserve.

Free translation from the Spanish by
Servicios Koinonia, http://www.servicioskoinonia.org.
Done at REFUGIO DEL RIO GRANDE, Texas, EE.UU.

Renewing the natural contract with the Earth

Until now, the Western White man’s dream, made universal by globalization, is to dominate the Earth and subdue all other beings, in order to gain unlimited benefits. That dream, four centuries later, has turned into a nightmare. Now as never before, the apocalypse can be precipitated by us, as the great historian Arnold Toynbee wrote before he died.

For that reason, we must reconstruct our humanity and our civilization through a different kind of relationship with the Earth, so that she may be sustainable: that is, to attain the conditions for maintenance and reproduction that sustain life in the planet. That will only happen if we retake the natural pact with the Earth and if we consider that all living beings, carriers of the same basic genetic code, form the great community of life. Every being has intrinsic value and therefore has rights.

All contracts start with reciprocity, inter-exchange, and a recognition of the rights of each party. From the Earth we receive everything: life and the means of living. In return, in the name of the natural contract, we have a duty of gratitude, reciprocity, and caring, so that she may maintain her vitality and may do what she has always done for all of us. But we broke that contract long ago.

To remake that natural contract we must act like the prodigal son in the parable of Jesus of Nazareth. We must return to the Earth, to the Common Home, and ask for forgiveness. Forgiveness means a change in our behavior regarding the respect and caring she deserves. The Earth is our Mother, the Pacha Mama of the Andean people, and the Gaia of the moderns. If we do not re-establish that link it will be difficult for us to survive. The Earth may not want us anymore on the face of the Earth. This is why sustainability here and now is essential. Either it prevails or we will experience a tragedy of the life-system and the human species.

All the times we have broken the natural contract notwithstanding, Mother Earth still sends us positive signs. In spite of global warming, and the erosion of bio-diversity, the sun is still shining, the sabia, the Brazilian thrush, still sings every morning, the flowers smile to all who pass by, the hummingbirds hover over the buds of the lilies, children continue to be born and confirm to us that God still believes in humanity and that it has a future.

Remaking the natural contract implies rescuing the vision and values expressed in the speech of Duwamish Grandfather Seattle, uttered in the presence of Isaac Stevens, the governor of Washington territory, in 1856:

“Of one thing we are certain: the Earth does not belong to man. Man belongs to the Earth. All things are interconnected. What hurts the Earth, also hurts the sons and daughters of Mother Earth. It was not the human being who created the fabric of life; the human being is only one thread in it. All that a human being does to that fabric, he does to himself. … We would understand the intentions of the White man, if we knew his dreams, if we knew the hopes he passes on to his sons and daughters in the long winter nights, what visions of the future he offers their minds, so that they may create dreams for tomorrow”.

On April 22, 2009, after long and difficult negotiations, the Assembly of the United Nations unanimously adopted the idea that the Earth is Mother. This declaration is filled with meaning. The Earth as soil and ground can be removed, used, bought and sold. The Earth as Mother can neither be sold nor bought, but only loved, respected and cared for, as we do with our mothers. This behavior will reaffirm the natural contract that will provide sustainability for our planet, because it reestablishes the relationship of mutuality.

The Aymara President of Bolivia, Evo Morales Ayma, never ceases to repeat that the XXI century will be the century of the rights of Mother Earth, of nature and of all living beings. In his April 22, 2009, intervention in the UN session in which I took part with a speech on the theoretical foundations of the Earth as Mother, he succinctly enumerated some of the rights of Mother Earth:

– the right of regeneration of the bio-capability of Mother Earth,

– the right to life of all living beings, especially of those threatened with extinction.

– the right to a pure life, because Mother Earth has the right to live free of contamination and pollution,

– the right of all citizens to a good living,

– the right to harmony and equilibrium with all things,

– the right to a connection with the Whole of which we are a part.

This vision allows us to renew the natural contract with the Earth that, combined with the social contract between its citizens, will, in the end, reinforce planetary sustainability.

For the original peoples such an attitude is natural. We, to the degree we have lost the connection with nature, have also lost the awareness of our relationship of knowledge and gratitude towards Mother Earth. Hence the importance of revisiting the original peoples and learning from them the respect and veneration the Earth deserves.

Free translation from the Spanish sent by
Melina Alfaro, cybermelinaalfaro@bandalibre.com,
done at REFUGIO DEL RIO GRANDE, Texas, EE.UU.

Renewing the natural contract with the Earth

Leonardo Boff
Theologian-Philosopher
Earthcharter Commission

Until now, the Western White man’s dream, made universal by globalization, is to dominate the Earth and subdue all other beings, in order to gain unlimited benefits. That dream, four centuries later, has turned into a nightmare. Now as never before, the apocalypse can be precipitated by us, as the great historian Arnold Toynbee wrote before he died.

For that reason, we must reconstruct our humanity and our civilization through a different kind of relationship with the Earth, so that she may be sustainable: that is, to attain the conditions for maintenance and reproduction that sustain life in the planet. That will only happen if we retake the natural pact with the Earth and if we consider that all living beings, carriers of the same basic genetic code, form the great community of life. Every being has intrinsic value and therefore has rights.

All contracts start with reciprocity, inter-exchange, and a recognition of the rights of each party. From the Earth we receive everything: life and the means of living. In return, in the name of the natural contract, we have a duty of gratitude, reciprocity, and caring, so that she may maintain her vitality and may do what she has always done for all of us. But we broke that contract long ago.

To remake that natural contract we must act like the prodigal son in the parable of Jesus of Nazareth. We must return to the Earth, to the Common Home, and ask for forgiveness. Forgiveness means a change in our behavior regarding the respect and caring she deserves. The Earth is our Mother, the Pacha Mama of the Andean people, and the Gaia of the moderns. If we do not re-establish that link it will be difficult for us to survive. The Earth may not want us anymore on the face of the Earth. This is why sustainability here and now is essential. Either it prevails or we will experience a tragedy of the life-system and the human species.

All the times we have broken the natural contract notwithstanding, Mother Earth still sends us positive signs. In spite of global warming, and the erosion of bio-diversity, the sun is still shining, the sabia, the Brazilian thrush, still sings every morning, the flowers smile to all who pass by, the hummingbirds hover over the buds of the lilies, children continue to be born and confirm to us that God still believes in humanity and that it has a future.

Remaking the natural contract implies rescuing the vision and values expressed in the speech of Duwamish Grandfather Seattle, uttered in the presence of Isaac Stevens, the governor of Washington territory, in 1856:

“Of one thing we are certain: the Earth does not belong to man. Man belongs to the Earth. All things are interconnected. What hurts the Earth, also hurts the sons and daughters of Mother Earth. It was not the human being who created the fabric of life; the human being is only one thread in it. All that a human being does to that fabric, he does to himself. … We would understand the intentions of the White man, if we knew his dreams, if we knew the hopes he passes on to his sons and daughters in the long winter nights, what visions of the future he offers their minds, so that they may create dreams for tomorrow”.

On April 22, 2009, after long and difficult negotiations, the Assembly of the United Nations unanimously adopted the idea that the Earth is Mother. This declaration is filled with meaning. The Earth as soil and ground can be removed, used, bought and sold. The Earth as Mother can neither be sold nor bought, but only loved, respected and cared for, as we do with our mothers. This behavior will reaffirm the natural contract that will provide sustainability for our planet, because it reestablishes the relationship of mutuality.

The Aymara President of Bolivia, Evo Morales Ayma, never ceases to repeat that the XXI century will be the century of the rights of Mother Earth, of nature and of all living beings. In his April 22, 2009, intervention in the UN session in which I took part with a speech on the theoretical foundations of the Earth as Mother, he succinctly enumerated some of the rights of Mother Earth:

– the right of regeneration of the bio-capability of Mother Earth,

– the right to life of all living beings, especially of those threatened with extinction.

– the right to a pure life, because Mother Earth has the right to live free of contamination and pollution,

– the right of all citizens to a good living,

– the right to harmony and equilibrium with all things,

– the right to a connection with the Whole of which we are a part.

This vision allows us to renew the natural contract with the Earth that, combined with the social contract between its citizens, will, in the end, reinforce planetary sustainability.

For the original peoples such an attitude is natural. We, to the degree we have lost the connection with nature, have also lost the awareness of our relationship of knowledge and gratitude towards Mother Earth. Hence the importance of revisiting the original peoples and learning from them the respect and veneration the Earth deserves.

Free translation from the Spanish sent by
Melina Alfaro, cybermelinaalfaro@bandalibre.com,
done at REFUGIO DEL RIO GRANDE, Texas, EE.UU.