A cosmic view of evolution gives us hope

Let us forget for a second our normal way of looking at things, and try to put our present crisis in the framework of cosmic time. Perhaps this way we can understand it better; by seeing it relatively, we can gain a better grasp of it, in a hopeful context.

The Time of the Cosmos

Let’s imagine that the more or less 13 billion year history of the universe has been condensed into a single century. Each “cosmic year” would be equivalent to 113 million Earth years.

From this point of view, the Earth was born in the year 70 of the cosmic century, and life appeared in the oceans, to our surprise, somewhere after the 73rd year. During almost two cosmic decades, life was essentially limited to single cell bacteria.

A new creative phase began in the year 93, with the appearance of sexual reproduction of living organisms. This, together with other forces, was responsible for changing the face of the planet, because it radically transformed the atmosphere, the oceans, and geology of the Earth, allowing our planet to sustain more complex forms of life. A great part of the biosphere is the creation of those microorganisms.

In this new phase, the evolutionary process accelerated rapidly. Two years later, in the year 95, the first multi-cellular organisms appeared. One year later, in the year 96, we witnessed the appearance of nervous systems, and in the year 97, the first vertebrate organisms. Mammals appeared in the middle of the year 98, that is, two months after dinosaurs and an immense variety of plants.

Five cosmic months ago, asteroids fell on the Earth, destroying many species, including the dinosaurs. However, shortly thereafter, the Earth, as if taking revenge, produced a diversity of life such as never before.

It was during this era, when flowers appeared, that our ancestors entered the evolutionary scene. Then they became bipeds (twelve cosmic days ago), and with homo habilis, they began to use tools (6 cosmic days ago), while the homo erectus conquered fire (just one cosmic day ago). Twelve cosmic hours ago, modern humans appeared (homo sapiens).

During the afternoon and night of our first cosmic day, we lived in harmony with nature, and were attentive to her rhythms and dangers. Our presence had little impact on the biological community until 40 minutes ago, when we began to domesticate plants and animals and to develop agriculture. After that, our interventions on nature intensified, and twenty minutes ago, we began to build and inhabit cities.

Only two minutes ago has our impact become really threatening. Europe transformed herself into a technological society and expanded her power through colonialist exploration. In this phase the project-world was formed, creating a center with several peripheries and a gap between the rich and the poor.

In the last twelve seconds (since 1950) the rhythm of ecological exploration and destruction has dramatically accelerated. In this brief period, we have brought down almost half of the largest jungles. In the next twenty cosmic seconds, the temperature of the Earth will rise by up to 0.5º C, and within a short time, it could rise by up to 5º C, endangering the greater part of the biosphere and millions of people. In the last five cosmic seconds, the Earth has lost an amount of soil equivalent to all the arable land of France and China, and has been inundated by dozens of thousands of new chemical products, many of which are highly toxic, and threaten the very bases of life.

We are now exterminating from 27 to 100 thousand species a year. Some scientists estimate that in the next 7 cosmic seconds, from 20 to 50 % of all species will disappear. When will this stop? And why so much devastation?

We respond: so that a small portion of Humanity can have the private or corporate enjoyment of the “benefits” of civilization. The richest 20% actually make two hundred times more than the poorest 20%. At the start of 2008, before the present economic-financial crisis, a few thousand millionaires together had more or less double the combined annual income of the poorest 50%. In terms of income, the richest 1% of humanity receives the equivalent of what the poorest 57% receives.

The Time of the Earth

Our planet, the fruit of more than four billion years of evolution, is being devoured by a small minority of humans. For the first time in the history of human evolution, such a minority, and, to a lesser degree, all of us, are causing the problems discussed above. The dangers this creates threaten our future and our way of life.

However, while we insist on the gravity of the crisis, we don’t want to project such an apocalyptic vision that it causes paralysis and desperation. Just as we created these problems, we can also solve them, although some are irreversible. This means that there is hope of satisfactorily resolving the crisis.

Those who joined the High Gathering of the Peoples this past July in Rio de Janeiro, or took part in the World Social Forums, are aware that there are thousands and thousands of conscious and creative people, all over the world, working to formulate practical alternatives that can allow humanity to live with dignity, without hurting the health of the ecosystems and of Mother Earth.

We have the information and knowledge necessary to solve the present crisis. What we need is to activate the cordial and emotional intelligence that elicits the necessary dreams, solidarity, compassion, and feelings of interdependency and universal responsibility.

It is important to recognize that the threats we face are symptoms of a chronic cultural and spiritual illness. It affects all of us, especially the 20% of us who consume the greater part of the world’s wealth. This crisis forces us to create a different paradigm of civilization, because the present one is too destructive. This is what we write about so frequently in our articles.

Times of crisis can also be times of creativity, times when new visions and new opportunities appear. The Chinese character for crisis, weiji, results from the combination of the characters for danger and opportunity. This is not a simple contradiction or paradox; the very real dangers force us to look to the deeper causes and seek alternatives, so as not to waste the opportunities.

In our culture, crisis derives from the Sanskrit word, kri, that means to purify and to reveal. Thus, it is about a very painful, but highly positive, process of purifying our vision, that functions as a crucible of our ethical-spiritual attitudes. Both meanings, the Chinese and the Sanskrit, are illuminating.

Our time

We need to revisit the sources of wisdom of humanity’s many cultures. Some are ancestral and come to us through very diverse cultural and spiritual traditions. The category of the “good living” of the Andean cultures is fundamental. Others are more modern, such as profound ecology, feminism and eco-feminism, transpersonal psychology, and the new cosmology, derived from the complex sciences, astrophysics, and the new knowledge about life and the Earth.

I end with the testimony of two noted Northamerican ecologists and educators, Joanna Macy and Molly Young Brown, who affirm: «The most extraordinary characteristic of the present historical moment of the Earth is not that we are headed towards the devastation of our planet, because we have already been doing so for a long time, but that we are starting to awaken from a millenarian dream to a new type of relationship with nature, with life, with the Earth, with the others and with ourselves. This new understanding will make possible the so much longed for Great Transformation.» (Joanna Macy and Molly Young Brown, Nossa vida como Gaia, 2004, 37). The Great Transformation will come, by the grace of evolution, and of God.

Corrupt: the one whose heart is broken

 

The widespread indignation over corruption in Brazil and around the world is giving way to resignation and indifference, because impunity is so nearly universal that most people lack confidence that it can be resolved.

Theology has something to say about this. Theology maintains that the present human condition is degenerate and decadent (infralapsárica, as is said in theological dialect), due to a corrupt act. According to the Biblical narrative, the serpent corrupted the woman, the woman corrupted the man, and together they left us a legacy of corruption on top of corruption, to the point that even God “repented …that He had made human beings on the Earth,” as the text of Genesis, 6,6, reminds us. We are the sons and daughters of an original corrupt act.

Christianity holds that all evil derives from that original corruption, called, original sin. But this expression has become alien to the modern ear. Few people refer to it.

Still, I dare to rescue it, because it holds an undeniable truth, confirmed by Sartre’s philosophical reflection and even Kant’s philosophical strictness, according to which, «the human being is such a twisted wood that it cannot provide straight planks».

It is important to note that it is a term created by theology. It is not found as such in the Bible. It was invented by Saint Augustine, in an epistolary dialogue with Saint Jerome. He did not use the expression “original sin” as referring to the past. “Original” had nothing to do with the origins of human history. Saint Augustine referred to the present: the present situation of the human being at his most deepest level is perverse and marked by a distortion involving the very origins of his existence (from this, “original”). Augustine uses the philology of the word “corrupt”: it means to have a heart, (cor, from corazón), that is broken, (ruptus, from rompere).

We are, consequently, carriers of an internal rupture that is equivalent to a laceration of the heart. In modern terms: we are dia-bolic and sym-bolic, sapient and demented, capable of love and hate.

This is the present humaine condition. But, out of curiosity, Saint Augustine would ask, when did it begin? He himself answers: ever since we know of the human being; from the “origins” (hence the second meaning of “original”). But that question is not important to him. What is important is that in the here and now we are corrupt beings, corruptible and corrupting. And that we believe in someone, Christ, who can free us from this situation.

But where is this state of corruption most visible? The answer is given to us by the famous, catholic, Lord Acton (1843-1902): it is in those who hold power. He emphatically affirms: «my dogma is the general evil of men in power; they are the most corruptible». And he gave us the now oft-repeated saying: «power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely». But just why is it power? Because it is one of the strongest and most tempting archetypes of the human psyche; it gives us a feeling of omnipotence and of being little «gods». Hobbes in his Leviathan (1651) confirms: «I note that all men have a general tendency towards a perpetual and restless desire for power and more power, that ceases only with death. The reason for this lies in the fact that power cannot be assured except by seeking still more power».

That power materializes in money. This is why the corruption that we are witnessing now always involves money and more money. There is a saying in Ghana: «the mouth laughs, but money laughs better». The corrupt one believes in that illusion.

We have not yet found a cure for this inner wound. We can only slow down the bleeding. I believe that, in the final analysis, the Biblical method has value: to unmask the corrupt one, leaving him naked to face his corruption, and a pure and simple expulsion from paradise, that is, to remove the corrupting and the corrupted from society, and throw them in jail.

What to demand from neoliberal Capitalism in crisis

 

The crisis of neoliberalism has reached the heart of the main countries that assumed unto themselves the right not only to determine the economic-financial processes, but also to set the very course of human history. It is a crisis of the political ideology of the minimalized state and privatization of public goods, as well as of the capitalist form of production, exacerbated to the extreme by a concentration of power such as history has never before seen. We expect that this crisis will have a systemic and terminal character.

The genius of capitalism has always found means to their ends of unlimited accumulation, and has used them all, including war. Capitalism would gain by destroying, and then by rebuilding. The crisis of 1929 was solved not by economic means, but by the Second World War. That course seems now impracticable, because war is so destructive that it could exterminate human life and the better part of the biosphere. But we are not certain that, in its insanity, capitalism will not resort to this means.

This time there are insurmountable limits, that allow to say that the historic time of capitalism is ending. The first is the filled-up world, that is, capitalism has occupied all the space at the planetary level for its expansion. The other, that is truly insurmountable, are the limitations of planet Earth. Her goods and services are limited and many of them are not renewable. As Italian analyst Luigi SojaIn assures us, the past generation has consumed more energy resources than all previous generations combined. What will we do when they reach a critical point, or simply are exhausted? The scarcity of drinking water can force humanity to confront the destruction of millions of lives.

Until now, the regulations and controls that have been proposed have simply been ignored. The United Nations Commission for the International Financial and Monetary Crisis, whose coordinator was Nobel laureate for Economics Joseph Stiglitz, (known as the Stiglitz Commission), launched a great effort in January 2009 to present Keynesian type, intra-systemic reforms.

It proposed a reform of the international financial organisms (IMF, World Bank) and of the WMO (World Market Organization). It envisioned the creation of a global Council of Economic Coordination at the same level as the Security Council, the construction of a system of global reserves to counterbalance the hegemony of the dollar as the currency of reference, the institution of an international fiscal system, the abolition of tax havens and banking secrecy, and, finally, reform of the certification agencies. It was all rejected. The UN accepted only the creation of a permanent Group of Experts for the Prevention of Crises, to which no one pays any attention, because what really matters are the stock markets and financial speculation.

This disappointing realization convinces us that the logic of this hegemonic system can cause the planet to become unfriendly to us, and lead us to grave socio-ecological catastrophes, so severe that they could threaten our civilization and the human species. In Rio+20, this type of capitalism was dressed up in green, in order to put a price on all natural goods and services that are common to humanity. The fact is that it lacks the medium and long range conditions needed to guarantee its hegemony. A different way of inhabiting the planet Earth and utilizing her goods and services must arise.

The great challenge is how to handle the transition towards a post-capitalist liberal world, namely, to a social system that is oriented towards the Well Being of Humanity and of the Earth, that sustains all life and reflects a new relationship of belonging and of synergy with nature and the Earth.

Production is necessary, but in a way that respects the reach and limits of each eco-system, not merely to accumulate but to meet human needs, in a sufficient and decent form. It is also important to care for all forms of life and to seek a social equilibrium, with a view always to the future generations that have a right to a well-preserved and inhabitable Earth.

On these pages, we must set forth alternatives. We start with what is possible within the current system, because there is no way to get out of it in a short time.

We see that in the international division of labor, Latin America and Brazil are condemned to exploit what is extracted from their mines and commodities, natural goods like food, grains and meats. To confront this type of exploitation we must follow the steps suggested by several analysts, especially by the great friend of Brazil, François Houtart, in his recent book, with other collaborators: A Post-Capitalist Paradigm: the Common Good of Humanity (Un paradigma poscapitalista: el Bien Común de la Humanidad, Panamá 2012).

First, to fight within the system for ecological norms and international regulations that, to the extent possible, care for the natural goods and services imported from our countries, and restrict their use to socially responsible and ecologically correct forms. Soybeans are first for feeding the people, and only after that, the animals.

Second, to protect our autonomy, to reject the neocolonialism of the central countries that, as in yesteryear, keep us on the periphery, secondary, subordinated and lesser suppliers of the raw materials they need. We must look for ways to incorporate technologies that give added value to our products, that create technological innovations and direct the economy, first, toward the internal market and only thereafter, to the external market.

Third, to demand that importing countries pollute the environment as little as possible, and that they contribute financially to the care and ecological regeneration of the ecosystems from which they import raw materials, especially from the Amazon and remote regions.

It is about reforms and not yet of revolutions. But they will help create a basis for proposing a new paradigm that is not a prolongation of the present, perverse and decadent one.

 

 

Reason in the Phase of Caterpillar and the Cocoon

 

Those who have read my recent texts on ecology and the dramatic situation of the Earth, have perhaps been left with an impression of pessimism. Those who perceive the real dangers that endanger our destiny cannot be pessimists. We must always respect reality, but at the same time, we must broaden our understanding of that reality. That is key, because the potential is also part of the actual. All events present a utopic reserve. If we understand reality thus enriched, a static pessimism is not justified, but a hope-filled realism. This captures the eventual emergence of the new, that which is hidden within the potential and the utopic. The new then makes history, creates another state of consciousness and inaugurates a different social essay.

Moreover, if we step back and measure our history against cosmic time, we find even more reason for hope. If we condense into one year the 13.7 billion years that is the presumed age of our universe, we will notice that as we humans have existed for only a tiny fraction of that time. Thus, on December 31st, at 5 p.m., our pre-human ancestors emerged. On December 31st at 10 p.m. the primitive human being entered the scene. On December 31st at 10 seconds after 11:58 p.m., the humans of today, called sapiens, emerged. On December 31st at 56 seconds after 11:59 p.m., Jesus of Nazareth was born. On December 31st at 59.2 seconds after 11:59 p.m., Cabral arrived to Brazil.

As can be seen, time-wise we are almost nothing.

Further, if we consider the 15 great destructive events that Earth has endured, especially the Cambrian of 570 million years ago, in which between 75 and 90% of the biotic capital disappeared, we can see that life has always endured and survived. And if we concentrate only on human beings, we have survived the many glaciations. In addition, the human being had a highly accelerated process of encefalization (increasing brain size relative to total body mass). For some 2.2 million years, there appeared homo habilis, then homo erectus, and in the last one hundred thousand years, homo sapiens, already clearly human. They were social beings, demonstrated cooperativity, and used speech, a human characteristic.

In the space of one million years, the brain of these three types of homo doubled in volume. After the appearance of homo sapiens, 100 thousand years ago, brain size did not increase. It was no longer necessary, given the development of the exterior brain, artificial intelligence, that is, the capacity of knowing, of creating instruments and artifacts to transform the world and create culture, a singular characteristic of the homo sapiens sapiens.

Starting with the neolithic age, around 10 thousand years ago, the first cities were established, thus beginning the process of developing culture, the state, bureaucracy and also, war. The systematic use of the instrumental reason to dominate nature, to conquer and to submit to others, was also established. There were obviously other types of reason as well, such as the emotional, symbolic and cordial, but they were subordinate to instrumental reason, a form of reason that is simultaneously both creative and destructive, and which, up to the present, has assumed hegemony.

The process of the butterfly offers us a suggestive metaphor. The butterfly is not born a butterfly. It is at the beginning a simple egg that transforms itself into a caterpiller, an insatiable devourer of leaves. Then she coils up and builds around herself a cocoon (chrysalis). Inside the cocoon, nature weaves her body and paints it with colors. When all is ready, the cocoon breaks and the splendid butterfly surges.

We are still in the stage of caterpillars and cocoons. Caterpillars, because day and night we devour nature; cocoons, because we have closed in on ourselves, seeing nothing around us.

Wherein lies our hope? That reason may break forth from the cocoon and emerge as butterfly-reason. Perhaps the present situation of grave danger will force the birth of butterfly-reason. She will fly about, not destructive but cooperative, because the butterfly aids the pollenation of flowers.

We are still in genesis. We have not finished being born. Once we are fully born, we will respect and coexist with all beings. We will have overcome forever the phase of the caterpillar and the cocoon . As butterflies, we will be carriers of the sensible reason that enables us to share with the Earth a future without threats.