Theology By and From the Perspective of Women

Pope Francis has said that we need a more profound theology of women and their mission in the world and in the Church. That is true, but he cannot ignore that there is already a wide theological literature of the highest quality, done by women from the perspective of women, that has enormously enriched our experience of God. I myself have intensely explored the theme, and ended up writing two books: The Maternal Face of God, (1989) and Feminine-Masculine (2010), this latter one in collaboration with feminist Rosemarie Muraro. Among so many in the present, I decided to bring attention to two great women  theologians of the past, who were truly innovative: Saint Hildegard of Bingen (1098-1179) and Saint Juliana of Norwich (1342-1416).

Saint Hildegard of Bingen (1098-1179), considered perhaps the first feminist within the Church, was an extraordinary and genial woman, not only for her times, but for all times. She was a Benedictine nun and mistress (abbess) of her Rupertsberg of Bingen convent on the river Rhine, a prophet (profetessa germanica), mystic, theologian, passionate preacher, composer, poet, naturalist, informal physician, playwright and German writer.

It is a mystery to her biographers and scholars how this woman could have accomplished all that in the narrow and machista medieval world. In every field she touched she displayed excellence and enormous creativity.  Her books are numerous, on mysticism, poetry, the natural sciences, and music. The most important, which is read even today, is Scivias Domini, (Know the Paths of the Lord).

Hildegard was above all a woman endowed with divine visions. In an autobiographical text she says: “When I was forty two and seven moths old, the heavens opened up and a blinding light of exceptional brightness flowed into my brain. And then it seared my heart and chest like a flame which did not burn, but warmed … and suddenly I understood the meaning of what was set forth in the books, that is, in the Psalms, the Gospels, and the other Catholic books of the Old and New Testament ” (see the complete text in Wikipedia, Hildegard of Bingen, with an excellent commentary and bibliography).

It is surprising that she had such knowledge of cosmology, medicinal plants, the physics of the bodies and the history of humanity. Theology speaks of the «infuse science» as a gift of the Holy Spirit. Hildegard was distinguished by such a gift.

She developed a curiously holistic vision, always connecting the human being with nature and the cosmos. In this context she speaks of the Holy Spirit as the energy that gives viriditas to all things. Viriditas comes from “verde”, green.  It means the greenness and freshness that characterizes all things penetrated by the Holy Spirit. Sometimes she speaks of the «immeasurable sweetness of the Holy Spirit, who with His grace embraces all creatures»  (Flanagan, Hildegard of Bingen, 1998, 53). Hildegard developed a humanizing image of God because He rules the universe «with might and mildness» (mit Macht und Milde) accompanying all beings with His caring hand and His loving gaze (cf. Fierro, N., Hildegard of Bingen and her vision of the Feminine, 1994, 187).

Hildegard was especially known for the medicinal methods she developed, which are still followed in Austria and Germany by some physicians. She reveals a surprising knowledge of the human body and of which active principles of the medicinal herbs are appropriate for different illnesses. Her canonization was ratified by Benedict XVI in 2012.

Another notable woman was Juliana of Norwich, in England (1342-1416). Little is known about her life, whether she was a woman religious or a lay widow. The truth is that she lived secluded, in a walled enclosure of the Church of Saint Julian. When she was 30 years old she had a grave illness that almost caused her death. At one point, for five hours she had visions of Jesus Christ. She immediately wrote a summary of her visions. And twenty years later, after having contemplated the meaning of these visions, she wrote a longer and definitive version, Revelations of Divine Love (Revelaciones del Amor Divino, London, 1952).  It is the first known text written in English by a woman.

Her revelations are surprising because they are filled with an indomitable optimism, born of the love of God. She speaks of love as happiness and compassion. She does not accept, as was a popular belief at the time, and still is among some groups, that illnesses are punishments from God. For Juliana, illness and pestilence are opportunities to know God.

Juliana sees sin as a kind of learning tool, through which God demands that we know ourselves, and seek his mercy.  She says more:  beyond of what we call hell lies a greater reality, always victorious, which is the love of God.

Because Jesus is merciful and our beloved mother is compassionate. God Himself is the merciful Father and Mother of infinite goodness (Revelations, 119).

Only a woman could use such language of love and compassion, and call God the Mother of infinite goodness.  Thus we see once again how important the feminine voice is for a non-patriarchal, and therefore more complete conception of God and of the Spirit that flows through all life and the universe.

Many other women could be mentioned here, such as Saint Teresa of Avila (1515-1582), Simone Weil (1909-1943), Madeleine Delbrel (1904-1964), Mother Teresa, and among us now, Ivone Gebara and Maria Clara Bingemer, who thought and think of faith from a woman’s perspective.  And they continue to enrich us.

Free translation from the Spanish by
Servicios Koinonia, http://www.servicioskoinonia.org.
Done at REFUGIO DEL RIO GRANDE, Texas, EE.UU.

We live in an ecocidal world

On September 27th the Intergovernmental Panel of Climate Change, IPCC, consisting of a few hundred scientists, gathered in Stockholm, Sweden, to evaluate the level of global warming, and they shared with us some worrisome data: «the concentrations of carbon dioxide, (CO2), methane, (CH4), and nitrous oxide, (N2O), primarily responsible for global warming, now considerably surpass the highest concentrations registered in ice nuclei during the last 800,000 years». It is 95% certain that human activity has contributed to this warming. Between 1951 and 2010, the temperature rose between 0.5°C and 1.3°C, and in some places it has already risen by 2°C. The predictions for Brazil are not good: starting in 2050, we could have a permanent summer: all year round.

This temperature could have devastating effects on many eco systems, and on children and the elderly. The IPCC scientists issued a passionate call to the people, to initiate immediate action on a global level, in terms of production and consumption, that might reverse this process and reduce its harmful effects. As Swiss Thomas Stocker, one of the coordinators of the final report said: «The most important question is not where are we now, but where we will be in 10, 15 or 30 years. And that depends on what we do today».

It appears that little or nothing is being done in a measurable and global form. The economic interests in unlimited accumulation, at the expense of depleting the natural goods and services, trump any concern for the future of life and the integrity of the Earth.

After reading the 31 pages of that report, one is left with the fundamental perception that we live in a world order that is systematically destroying the capacity of the planet to sustain life. We relate with nature and with the Earth as a whole in an ecocidal and geocidal manner. If we continue in this direction, we will surely meet an ecosocial tragedy.

The purpose of numerous groups, movements and activists is centered on identifying new forms of living, so that we may guarantee life in her great diversity and live in harmony with the Earth, the community of life, and the cosmos.

In a book that required more than 10 years of intensive research, Canadian Marcos Hathaway, an educator, expert in modern cosmology, and myself, tried to present a careful reflection that would include contributions of both East and West, seeking a direction viable for all. The book is: “The Tao of Liberation: Exploring the Ecology of Transformation”  (Voces 2012). Fritjof Capra wrote a fine prologue, and the Northamerican scientific community has welcomed the English edition: in 2010, the Nautilus Institute awarded us the gold medal for Science and Cosmology.

Our research starts with the following observation: there is an acute pathology inherent in the system that presently dominates and exploits the world: poverty, social inequality, exhaustion of Earth’s resources, and a strong disequilibrium of the life-system. The same forces and ideologies that exploit and exclude the poor are also devastating the entire community of life, and undermining the ecological bases that sustain planet Earth.

To overcome this tragic situation we are called upon, in a very real manner, to re-invent ourselves as a species. To that end we need wisdom, to lead us to a profound personal liberation/transformation, from masters of all things, to brothers and sisters of everything. That transformation also implies a collective liberation/reinvention through a different ecological format, that stimulates us to respect and to live according to the rhythms of nature. We must know what to take from her for our collective survival, and how to learn from her, because she is systemically structured in networks of intro-retro-relations that assure cooperation and solidarity of all with all, and that provide sustainability for life in all its forms, especially human life. Without our cooperation/solidarity with nature and other human beings, we will not find an efficacious solution.

Without a spiritual revolution (not necessarily religious) that involves a different way of thinking (a new vision) and a new heart (a new sensibility), we will search in vain for purely scientific and technical solutions. These are indispensable, but they must be integrated within a different framework of principles and values that are the basis for a new paradigm of civilization.

All this lies within the potentialities of the cosmogenic process, and also within human possibilities. It is important to believe in such realities. Without human faith and hope, we cannot build an arc that will save us a

Free translation from the Spanish sent by
Melina Alfaro, volar@fibertel.com.ar,
done at REFUGIO DEL RIO GRANDE, Texas, EE.UU.

Pope Francis and the shedding of pagan papal customs

The innovations in the customs and speeches of Pope Francis have led to an acute crisis in the conservative groups that strictly followed the directives of the two previous Popes. They find it especially intolerable that the Pope received in private audience one of the pioneers of the “condemned ” Theology of Liberation, Peruvian Gustavo Gutierrez. They are stunned by the Pope’s sincerity in recognizing the Church’s errors, and his own, and in denouncing the careerism of many prelates, calling “leprosy”  the courtesan and flattering spirit of many in power, who are known as “vaticancentrists”. What really scandalizes them is the inversion he makes, by putting in first place love, mercy, tenderness, dialogue with modernity and tolerance towards people, including the divorced and the homo-affective, and only in last place, ecclesiastic doctrines and discipline.

The voices are already being heard of the most radical,  who, referencing Pope Francis, offer petitions, “for the good of the Church” (evidently, their Church), such as: “Lord, illuminate or eliminate him”. Eliminating problematic popes is not a rarity in the long history of the papacy. There was a time, between the years 900 and 1000, in the so-called «pornocratic era» of the papacy, when virtually all the popes were either poisoned or assassinated.

The most frequent criticisms that circulate in the social media of these historically antiquated and backward groups, go along the line of accusing Pope Francis of undermining the sacred nature of the figure of the papacy, trivializing and secularizing it.  In reality, they ignore history and are hostage to a secular tradition that has little to do with the historical Jesus and life style of the Apostles. But it has lots to do with the gradual adoption of pagan and worldly customs by the Church, in the style of the pagan Roman emperors and Renaissance princes.

The door to this process was already opened in the times of Constantine (274-337), who recognized Christianity, and Theodosius (379-395) who made it the sole official religion of the Empire. The decline of the Roman Empire created the conditions for the bishops, especially the Bishop of Rome, to assume the functions of command and order. This was clear with Pope Leo I, the Great, (440-461), who was proclaimed Mayor of Rome in order to confront the invasion of the Huns. Leo was the first to use the term Pope, which previously had been reserved for the Roman emperors. It acquired greater strength with Pope Gregory Magnus (540-604), also proclaimed Mayor of Rome, and later culminated with Gregory VII (1021-1085) who assumed for himself absolute power in the religious and secular fields: perhaps the greatest revolution in the field of ecclesiology.

The present imperial, princely and courtesan customs of the hierarchy, the cardinals and the popes, date back in particular to Pope Sylvester (334-335). In his time the falsehood, the so-called, “Donation of Constantine”,  was created, with the objective of strengthening papal power. According to that “Donation”, emperor Constantine had given the Pope the city of Rome and the Occidental part of the Empire. Included in that “Donation”, unmasked as false by Cardinal Nicholas of Cusa (1400-1460), was the use of imperial emblems and clothing (purple), the title of Pope, the gold crosier, the cape, covered with ermine and trimmed with silk, on his shoulders, the formation of the court and the palatial residences.

This is the origin of the present princely and courtesan customs of the Roman Curia, of the hierarchy of the Church and the cardinals, especially of the Pope. Its source is the style of the pagan Roman emperors and the sumptuousness of the renaissance princes. There has been, then, a process of the Church as a hierarchical institution, adopting pagan and worldly customs.

Those who want to return to the ritual traditions that surround the figure of the Pope are not even conscious of this historically closed and conditioned process. They insist on something that does not comport with the evangelical values, and praxis, of Jesus.

What is Pope Francis doing? He is restoring to the papacy and the entire hierarchy their true style, linked to the Tradition of Jesus and the Apostles.  In fact, he is returning to the most ancient tradition, eliminating the pagan customs of the papacy, within the spirit of the Gospel, that were lived so emblematically by his mentor and inspiration, Saint Francis of Assisi.

The authentic tradition is on the side of Pope Francis. The tradicionalist are only that, tradicionalist and not traditionals. They are closer to the palace of Herod and Caesar Augustus, than to the grotto of Bethlehem and the house of the artisan from Nazareth. In contrast to them is the praxis of Jesus and His sayings about having nothing, about simplicity and humility, and power as service, rather than as exercised by the pagan princes and lords who subjugate and dominate: “it should not be that way among you, that the oldest be like the youngest and the one who gives commands be like the servant” (Luke 22,26). Pope Francis speaks from this original and oldest, tradition, the Tradition of Jesus and the Apostles. This destabilizes the conservatives, who have been left without arguments

Free translation from the Spanish sent by
Melina Alfaro, alfaro_melina@yahoo.com.ar,
done at REFUGIO DEL RIO GRANDE, Texas, EE.UU.

The Tradition of Jesus vs the Christian Religion

To adequately comprehend Christianity, one must make  some distinctions that are accepted by most scholars. Thus, it is important to distinguish between the historical Jesus and the Christ of the faith.  By historical Jesus is understood the preacher and prophet from Nazareth as he actually existed under Caesar Augustus and Herod. The Christ of the faith is the content of the preaching of his disciples, who see Him as the Son of God and Savior.

Another important distinction that must be made is between the Kingdom of God and the Church. The Kingdom of God is the original message of Jesus. It signifies an absolute revolution, redefining the relationships of human beings with God, (sons and daughters), of humans among themselves (all brothers and sisters), of humans with society (the centrality of the poor), and with the universe (the creation of a new heaven and a new Earth). The Church has been possible because Jesus was rejected and therefore, the Kingdom of God was not realized. The Church is a historical construction, that tries to carry on the cause of Jesus in different cultures and epochs. The dominant incarnation is in Western culture, but it is also found in Eastern culture, in the Copt and others.

It is also important to distinguish between theTradition of Jesus, and the Christian religion.  TheTradition of Jesus predates the writing of the Gospels, even though it is embodied in them. The Gospels were written from 30 to 60 years after the execution of Jesus. In the meantime, communities and churches were organized, with their tensions, internal conflicts and forms of organization. The Gospels reflect and are part of this situation.  The Gospels do not pretend to be historical books, but books for edification, and for the diffusion of the life and message of Jesus, as the Savior of the world.

What does theTradition of Jesus mean within this tangle? TheTradition of Jesus is that hard nucleus, the contents that fit in a nut shell and represent the original intention and praxis of Jesus (ipsissima intentio et acta Jesu) before the interpretations that were made of them. It could be summarized in the following: In the first place is the dream of Jesus, the Kingdom of God, as an absolute revolution of history and the universe, a conflictive proposition, because it opposed the kingdom of Caesar. Then, His personal experience of God, that He transmitted to His followers: God is Father (Abba), filled with love and tenderness. His special characteristic is to be merciful, God loves the ungrateful and the bad (Luke 6,35). Then He preaches and lives unconditional love, that He puts on the same level as the love of God. Another point is to give centrality to the poor and the invisible. They are the first addressed and beneficiaries of the Kingdom, not for their moral condition, but because they are deprived of life, which causes the living God to opt for them. Our conduct with them will determine whether or not we attain salvation (Matthew  25,46). Still another important point is community. He chose twelve to live with Him; the number twelve is symbolic: it represents the gathering of the 12 tribes of Israel and the reconciliation of all peoples, becoming The People of God. Finally, the use of power. The only legitimate use of power is that which serves the community, and the power holder must always seek to be in last place.

These values and visions form theTradition of Jesus. As can be seen, it is not about an institution, doctrine or discipline. Jesus wanted to teach how to live, not to create a new religion, an institution with pious parishioners. TheTradition of Jesus is a good dream, a spiritual path that can take many forms and also can have followers other than the religious and ecclesiastic.

TheTradition of Jesus transformed itself through history into a religion, the Christian religion: a religious organization consisting of different Churches, especially the Roman Catholic Church. These Churches are characterized by being institutions with doctrines, disciplines, ethical determinations, ritual forms of celebration and juridical canons. The Roman Catholic Church in particular was organized around the category of sacred power (sacra potestas), which it concentrated in the hands of a small elite, a hierarchy with the Pope at the head, to the exclusion of the laity and of women. The hierarchy holds on to the decision making, and a monopoly on the word. It is hierarchical, and creates great inequalities. The hierarchy illegitimately claims to be identified with theTradition of Jesus.

This type of historical transformation obscures the best of the originality and enchantment of theTradition of Jesus. It is why the Churches are all in crisis, because they are no longer “joy for all the people” (Luke 2,11), as they were at their beginnings.

Jesus, Himself, foresaw this development, warning that is of little use to observe the laws “and not worry about the most important, which is justice, mercy and faith; this is what is important, without excluding the other” (Matthew 23,23).

Returning to the present:  Wherein lies the fascination with the figure and speeches of Pope Francis? It is because he directly allies himself with theTradition of Jesus.  Pope Francis affirms that “love comes before dogma and service to the poor before doctrines” (Civiltà Cattolica). Without this inversion, Christianity loses “the freshness and the fragrance of the Gospel.”  It transforms itself into a religious ideology and becomes a doctrinarian obsession.

There is no way to regain the credibility the Roman Catholic Church has lost, other than to return to the Tradition of Jesus, as Pope Francis is wisely doing.

Free translation from the Spanish sent by
Melina Alfaro, alfaro_melina@yahoo.com.ar,
done at REFUGIO DEL RIO GRANDE, Texas, EE.UU.